

Michel Platini calls for Infantino to leave
Michel Platini called for FIFA president Gianni Infantino to leave office during an August 30 interview with Canal+. The former UEFA president said Infantino failed to respect the rules of football while leading the global governing body.
Platini also said he had always known Infantino loved money and power. The criticism came as FIFA faced pressure over governance, private investment plans, World Cup decisions, and legal action prepared by European football leaders.

Platini targets World Cup decisions
Platini focused on decisions made during the 2026 World Cup in North America. He argued that FIFA introduced practices that conflicted with established match rules, while Infantino remained responsible for protecting those standards throughout the tournament.
His complaints included mandatory hydration breaks, the extended halftime during the final, and FIFA’s handling of Folarin Balogun’s suspension. Platini presented those examples as evidence that football regulations were not applied consistently under Infantino.

FIFA required hydration breaks
FIFA announced before the tournament that every World Cup match would include a 3-minute hydration break midway through each half. The policy applied regardless of temperature, weather conditions, stadium roof status, or match location.
Platini criticized the breaks after some pauses lasted as long as 4 minutes and included broadcast advertising. FIFA said the policy supported player welfare and provided consistent hydration opportunities in every match.

FIFA final halftime exceeded 15 minutes
The World Cup final between Spain and Argentina featured the tournament’s first halftime entertainment show on July 19. The interval lasted 27 minutes and 19 seconds at New York New Jersey Stadium.
International Football Association Board laws state that the halftime interval must not exceed 15 minutes. The extended entertainment program, therefore, kept the players off the field substantially longer than the standard limit.

FIFA reviewed Balogun’s suspension
FIFA’s Disciplinary Committee reviewed the disciplinary case involving United States forward Folarin Balogun after his red card. The committee’s decision allowed him to avoid serving an immediate 1-match suspension and remain available for the match against Belgium.
The decision attracted attention due to comments by President Donald Trump about the incident and his reported communication with FIFA President Gianni Infantino. Critics questioned whether outside influence played a role, while FIFA’s disciplinary process remained the official basis for the decision.

Infantino proposed private FIFA investment
Infantino faced a separate crisis over FIFA Forward Enterprise, a proposed commercial company tied to FIFA competitions. The plan involved offering about 20% of the business to private investors for roughly $4.2 billion.
UEFA, Concacaf, and the Asian Football Confederation opposed the proposal. UEFA and its 55 national associations announced they would not participate in FIFA competitions before the project was withdrawn on August 1.

UEFA prepares Swiss legal action
UEFA escalated the dispute in August by preparing a criminal complaint in Switzerland alleging criminal mismanagement connected to FIFA Forward Enterprise. UEFA also sought documents and testimony through the United States federal courts.
UEFA challenged the proposed $20 billion valuation and alleged that the project lacked proper consultation and approvals. The requested evidence is intended to support the criminal complaint UEFA plans to pursue in Switzerland.

FIFA abandoned Forward Enterprise plan
FIFA confirmed on August 1 that the Forward Enterprise proposal would not proceed. Infantino said the project had become too divisive while maintaining that its intended purpose was to strengthen member associations and football development.
UEFA later suspended its immediate threat of a boycott after receiving a written assurance that the project had been permanently abandoned. European officials continued to seek an independent investigation and broader governance changes within FIFA after the proposal collapsed.

Dutch federation seeks FIFA overhaul
Pressure widened on August 30 when the Dutch Football Association called for a FIFA overhaul. The KNVB proposed a summit in Amsterdam and said Infantino should be replaced by 2027 as part of structural reform.
The Dutch federation criticized concentrated presidential power and called for stronger checks and balances. It invited FIFA’s 211 member associations and regional confederations to discuss governance, sustainability, human rights, and revenue distribution at the summit.

Infantino plans 2027 reelection bid
Gianni Infantino has announced that he intends to seek another term as FIFA president in 2027. His planned reelection campaign comes as FIFA faces criticism from some European football leaders and federations over governance issues.
Michel Platini scored 9 goals in 5 matches at UEFA Euro 1984, including two hat-tricks, and remains the tournament’s record scorer for a single edition.
Fun fact: Michel Platini scored 9 goals in just 5 matches at Euro 1984, including back-to-back hat-tricks, a single tournament record that still stands.

Platini and Infantino share UEFA history
Platini’s criticism carries additional history because Infantino served as UEFA secretary general during Platini’s presidency. Infantino later won the FIFA presidency in February 2016 after disciplinary proceedings prevented Platini from pursuing his campaign.
The case centered on a 2 million Swiss franc FIFA payment to Platini in 2011 that Sepp Blatter authorized. A Swiss appeals court acquitted both men again in March 2025.

Platini opened new French legal cases
Platini launched legal action in France in June 2026 against FIFA, Infantino, Marco Villiger, and Domenico Scala. His complaints concern events surrounding the 2015 case that prevented him from pursuing the FIFA presidency as planned.
The former UEFA leader alleges malicious prosecution and influence peddling connected to actions taken during that period. He also filed a civil case seeking compensation for financial damage he says resulted from those events.
FIFA’s $321,000 fine and player bans put Argentina under fresh scrutiny after disciplinary action. Wondering what triggered the penalties and whether they were justified? Dive into the case and the rules behind FIFA’s decision.

Platini says Infantino benefited in 2016
Platini said Infantino did not personally bring him down but benefited from his removal from leadership. Infantino moved from UEFA secretary general to FIFA president after the scandal blocked Platini from running for the position.
That history adds a personal dimension to Platini’s criticism, although his arguments focus on FIFA governance and rule enforcement. His legal claims remain allegations, while Infantino and FIFA have not accepted wrongdoing in Platini’s case.
The 2026 World Cup gave Major League Soccer a major visibility boost across North America. Wondering how much interest is carried over after the tournament? Dive into the numbers behind MLS’s growing popularity.
Should Michel Platini’s criticism increase pressure on Gianni Infantino to leave FIFA, or should leadership changes depend on the ongoing governance and legal reviews? Share your thoughts in the comments below!
This slideshow was made with AI assistance and human editing.
Read More From This Brand:



