Home NFL Why short-term contracts dominate today’s NFL

Why short-term contracts dominate today’s NFL

0
bellafotosolo/Depositphotos

The era of lengthy NFL contracts has come to an end as teams embrace shorter deals.

The NFL has experienced a major shift in how teams structure player contracts over the past few years. Long gone are the days when five and six-year deals dominated the landscape. Short contracts are now the norm across most positions.

Teams prioritize cap flexibility and roster control more than ever before. Players also see benefits in shorter deals that let them renegotiate sooner. This trend has fundamentally changed how organizations build their rosters and manage their financial futures.

Let’s explore why this shift happened.

Rising Salary Cap Creates Uncertainty

Teams now hesitate to lock players into lengthy deals when future cap numbers remain unpredictable.

The NFL salary cap jumped from $255.4 million in 2024 to $279.2 million in 2025, representing a significant increase. General managers cannot accurately predict what the market will look like three or four years down the road. This uncertainty makes shorter contracts far more attractive than lengthy commitments.

Front offices want the ability to adjust their spending as the cap evolves each season. A contract that seems reasonable today could become a burden tomorrow if the market shifts dramatically. Shorter deals provide teams with regular opportunities to reset and reevaluate their financial commitments without getting trapped.

People signing a contract.
Source Depositphotos

Franchise Tag Usage Increases

The franchise tag has become a powerful tool for teams seeking one-year control over star players.

Teams can use the franchise tag to retain elite players on fully guaranteed one-year deals without long-term risk. This mechanism allows organizations to evaluate player performance annually while maintaining roster flexibility. The tag value equals the average of the top five salaries at each position.

Players on franchise tags earn substantial money but cannot test free agency that year. Teams often use the tag as a negotiating tactic to push for team-friendly long-term deals. If negotiations fail, the team still keeps the player for another season without excessive commitment beyond twelve months.

Running Backs Face Devalued Market

The running back position has been hit hardest by the shift toward short term thinking.

Teams increasingly favor younger players on cheaper rookie contracts over veteran running backs seeking long-term security. The physical demands of the position lead to shorter career spans and higher injury risks. Organizations now view running backs as replaceable assets rather than cornerstone franchise players.

Rico Dowdle rushed for 1,079 yards in 2024 but received only a one-year contract worth $6.25 million from the Panthers. Similarly, Najee Harris signed a one-year deal despite four consecutive 1,000-yard seasons. This pattern demonstrates how teams now approach the running back market with extreme financial caution.

Void Years Create Flexibility

Contract structuring innovation allows teams to spread cap hits across multiple years while maintaining short playing terms.

Void years are dummy seasons added to the end of contracts that spread signing bonus charges across more years. A player might sign a two-year deal with three void years attached to spread the cap impact. This accounting mechanism provides immediate cap relief while pushing dead money into future seasons.

The Philadelphia Eagles have embraced this strategy more aggressively than most teams in recent years. They lead the NFL with over $427 million in void year cap charges spread from 2026 to 2033. This approach allows teams to sign more players now while deferring the financial consequences to later seasons.

Source Shutterstock

Players Betting On Themselves

Elite players increasingly prefer shorter deals with high annual values to hit free agency while still in their prime.

Quarterbacks and top-tier defensive players recognize that shorter contracts let them capitalize on rising salary caps. A three-year deal allows a player to renegotiate again at age 28 or 29 rather than being locked in. Players can maximize earnings by signing multiple shorter deals throughout their careers instead of one lengthy contract.

This strategy works best for confident players who believe their performance will remain elite. Each new contract becomes an opportunity to reset the market at their position. The risk lies in potential injury or performance decline before the next negotiating window arrives.

Rookie Contracts Provide Better Value

Teams draft young talent on predetermined four-year deals that offer tremendous cost control.

First round picks sign fully guaranteed four-year contracts with team-friendly cap numbers. These rookie deals represent the best value in the NFL because teams get young, hungry players at below market rates. Organizations can build around these cost-controlled assets while spending big money elsewhere on the roster.

Teams often prefer cycling through young, cheap talent rather than paying veterans premium salaries. This approach explains why running backs and other replaceable positions struggle to secure long-term deals. The draft constantly provides fresh talent willing to play for minimum salaries, while veterans demand multiyear commitments.

Injury Risk Drives Caution

The violent nature of football makes long-term contracts extremely risky investments for teams.

One devastating injury can turn a lucrative contract into an albatross that hampers roster construction for years. Teams remember cautionary tales of players who signed massive deals only to suffer career-altering injuries shortly after. Shorter contracts limit exposure to these risks by reducing the guaranteed years teams must pay injured players.

Players also face the reality that one bad injury could end their earning potential entirely. Some accept shorter deals with more guaranteed money upfront rather than gambling on long-term contracts. Both sides now approach negotiations with injury risk as a primary consideration when determining contract length and structure.

SourcenoonieDepositphotos

TL;DR

  • Short-term contracts have become the NFL standard as teams prioritize salary cap flexibility over long commitments.
  • The franchise tag allows teams to retain stars on one-year deals without extended risk.
  • Running backs face the toughest market, with most veterans receiving only one or two-year contracts.
  • Void years enable teams to spread cap hits across future seasons while maintaining short playing terms.
  • Players increasingly bet on themselves with shorter high-value deals to hit free agency multiple times.

Read More:

This article was made with AI assistance and human editing.

NO COMMENTS

Exit mobile version